Michael Schmidts Position in Milk Debates Research Paper

Michael Schmidts Position in Milk Debates - Research Paper Example Many people who had become used to consuming raw milk distributed by Michael found it extremely natural.   They claim that it had a flavor, better than any branded milk available at stores.   It also gave them great satisfaction that the milk came from well-cared animals living in an ideal natural farm near neighboring Grey Bruce County (CBC Documentaries).   One web-based discussion titled â€Å"Raw Milk Crusader† cites examples of people who opted for Michael’s milk and stated it offered a number of health benefits including relief from osteoporosis, healing allergies, and unlike pasteurized milk, did not cause constipation (CBC Documentaries). One nature lover Paul Noble, who is perturbed by the intrusion of the government in the issue concerning raw milk, opines, â€Å"if God had intended us to drink pasteurized milk, he would have put a pasteurizer on the cow† (Ananda). On the other hand, there is little doubt among health experts that there is a tangi ble menace in consuming raw milk, particularly for small children.   Milk that is not pasteurized could include a number of harmful bacteria, including campylobacter, listeria, salmonella, brucella, and E. coli 0157: H7 that led to the deaths of seven people in Walkerton in 2000.   Considering this fact, one needs to examine this issue both from a biological and basic human rights point of view.   The problem in simple terms stands as; ‘if someone decides to consume raw milk even after knowing it might harm him should he be prohibited from following his decision?’   Many human rights activists will perhaps disagree.   Rady Ananda in her article â€Å"How Safe Is Your Food?   GMO’s, Foodborne illness and Trade Agreements† are particularly worried about how governments and corporate houses are using the so-called ‘food safety’ to manipulate market access and control.  Ã‚